Tiger Global Management · Chase Coleman
Latest 13F holdings with ERM3 risk decomposition — how much of the portfolio's return is market beta versus genuine stock-picking, and where the residual risk concentrates.
- Reported AUM
- $19.3B
- Holdings
- 26
- Top-10 weight
- 80%
- As of
- 2025-12-31
- Filed
- 2026-03-16
Return attribution — beta or stock-picking?
Sum of monthly ERM3 attribution over the trailing 12 months (2025-01-31 → 2025-12-31), modeled subset of holdings. Roughly 14% of the gross return was idiosyncratic — most of the return came from factor exposure, not stock selection.
Gross
+22.1%
Market
+19.8%
Sector
+2.4%
Subsector
-4.1%
Stock-specific
+3.0%
Top holdings
26 reported positions; top 15 shown. “Stock-specific” is the share of each position's variance not explained by market, sector, or subsector factors.
| # | Holding | Weight | Value | Stock-specific |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MSFT | 13.7% | $2.6B | 56% |
| 2 | AMZN | 12.0% | $2.3B | 52% |
| 3 | NVDA | 10.6% | $2.1B | 46% |
| 4 | SE | 10.2% | $2.0B | 85% |
| 5 | META | 9.4% | $1.8B | 58% |
| 6 | TTWO | 7.7% | $1.5B | 77% |
| 7 | RDDT | 4.6% | $884M | 78% |
| 8 | APP | 4.5% | $871M | 76% |
| 9 | SPOT | 3.8% | $733M | 80% |
| 10 | GEV | 3.3% | $636M | 67% |
| 11 | CPNG | 3.2% | $620M | 87% |
| 12 | VEEV | 2.8% | $540M | 95% |
| 13 | CPAY | 2.7% | $527M | 83% |
| 14 | XYZ | 2.1% | $414M | 69% |
| 15 | ZS | 1.8% | $355M | 60% |
89% of reported AUM is in the ERM3 model universe; attribution and risk shares cover that subset. Source: SEC Form 13F-HR, filed 2026-03-16.
Interrogate this portfolio
Ask the AI risk analyst what changed last quarter, where the concentration risk sits, or how your portfolio overlaps with Chase Coleman's.