D. E. Shaw & Co. · David Shaw
Latest 13F holdings with ERM3 risk decomposition — how much of the portfolio's return is market beta versus genuine stock-picking, and where the residual risk concentrates.
- Reported AUM
- $120.4B
- Holdings
- 1761
- Top-10 weight
- 22%
- As of
- 2025-12-31
- Filed
- 2026-03-16
Return attribution — beta or stock-picking?
Sum of monthly ERM3 attribution over the trailing 12 months (2025-01-31 → 2025-12-31), modeled subset of holdings. Roughly 27% of the gross return came from stock selection (residual return) — most of the return came from factor exposure, not selection.
Gross
+25.4%
Market
+17.3%
Sector
-0.5%
Subsector
+0.4%
Stock selection
+6.9%
Top holdings
1761 reported positions; top 15 shown. “Stock-specific” is the share of each position's variance not explained by market, sector, or subsector factors.
| # | Holding | Weight | Value | Stock-specific |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 4.7% | $5.6B | 47% |
| 2 | MSFT | 3.3% | $3.9B | 52% |
| 3 | PLTR | 2.3% | $2.7B | 55% |
| 4 | TSLA | 2.2% | $2.6B | 47% |
| 5 | AMD | 2.1% | $2.5B | 49% |
| 6 | AAPL | 1.8% | $2.1B | 78% |
| 7 | AMZN | 1.7% | $2.1B | 48% |
| 8 | MU | 1.5% | $1.8B | 42% |
| 9 | META | 1.4% | $1.6B | 60% |
| 10 | NFLX | 1.3% | $1.5B | 81% |
| 11 | TXN | 1.2% | $1.4B | 76% |
| 12 | SOFI | 1.2% | $1.4B | 65% |
| 13 | LLY | 1.0% | $1.3B | 57% |
| 14 | WDC | 1.0% | $1.2B | 62% |
| 15 | GM | 1.0% | $1.2B | 78% |
100% of reported AUM is in the ERM3 model universe; attribution and risk shares cover that subset. Source: SEC Form 13F-HR, filed 2026-03-16.
Interrogate this portfolio
Ask the AI risk analyst what changed last quarter, where the concentration risk sits, or how your portfolio overlaps with David Shaw's.