Manager SkillAllocatorsExamplesEvidenceAnalyst
Checking session...

Manager Skill Review · Fund (strategy-level)

MEIJX — MFS Value Fund

Strategy-level ERM3 read from the fund's reported holdings — the mandate-accurate view. The stock-selection residual persists out of sample.

Large Value · 38 holdings · eff. N 29 · top-10 45% · as of 2026-05-31

Summary Risk Profile

Return attribution vs risk decomposition

MFS Value Fund is a Large Value strategy across 38 names (effective N 29, top-10 45%). MFS Value Fund's +13.2% trailing return was led by market beta (+17.3% market); stock selection contributed -1.7%. Over the trailing window stock selection detracted (-13% of gross); the risk decomposition is the steadier read.Beta to SPY 0.73 explains 69% of NAV variance; ERM3's multifactor model captures 96% · modeled-vs-reported NAV correlation 0.90 over 244 months.Evidence — not a recommendation.

Risk decomposition
This manager
82%
12%
Tracked-pension composite · 12 mgrs
73%
22%
▸Key
Market
Sector
Subsector
Style tilt
Stock selection

Cumulative return

trailing 12m · gross vs buyable

Strategy-level read from the fund's reported holdings via the RiskModels ERM3 model. Figures are gross, holdings-derived, and within-mandate. Informational use only — not investment advice.

Local-First Data Policy — Your holdings are resolved locally against our Security Master. Data never leaves your machine.

The Engine
  • API
  • SDK
  • CLI
The Science
  • Methodology
  • ERM3 overview
  • SEC Filing Calendar
Infrastructure
  • Privacy
  • Terms
RiskModelsResearch/Workspace/
Manager SkillAllocatorsExamplesEvidenceAnalyst
Checking session...

Manager Skill Review · Fund (strategy-level)

MEIJX — MFS Value Fund

Strategy-level ERM3 read from the fund's reported holdings — the mandate-accurate view. The stock-selection residual persists out of sample.

Large Value · 38 holdings · eff. N 29 · top-10 45% · as of 2026-05-31

Summary Risk Profile

Return attribution vs risk decomposition

MFS Value Fund is a Large Value strategy across 38 names (effective N 29, top-10 45%). MFS Value Fund's +13.2% trailing return was led by market beta (+17.3% market); stock selection contributed -1.7%. Over the trailing window stock selection detracted (-13% of gross); the risk decomposition is the steadier read.Beta to SPY 0.73 explains 69% of NAV variance; ERM3's multifactor model captures 96% · modeled-vs-reported NAV correlation 0.90 over 244 months.Evidence — not a recommendation.

Risk decomposition
This manager
82%
12%
Tracked-pension composite · 12 mgrs
73%
22%
▸Key
Market
Sector
Subsector
Style tilt
Stock selection

Cumulative return

trailing 12m · gross vs buyable

Strategy-level read from the fund's reported holdings via the RiskModels ERM3 model. Figures are gross, holdings-derived, and within-mandate. Informational use only — not investment advice.

Local-First Data Policy — Your holdings are resolved locally against our Security Master. Data never leaves your machine.

The Engine
  • API
  • SDK
  • CLI
The Science
  • Methodology
  • ERM3 overview
  • SEC Filing Calendar
Infrastructure
  • Privacy
  • Terms
RiskModelsResearch/Workspace/
Gross +16.6%Buyable +18.5%Selection gap -1.8%
API

© 2026 RiskModels.app|System Status:Operational|Built for the Intelligent Retailer.

Informational use only — not investment advice. Blue Water Macro Corp.

Gross +16.6%Buyable +18.5%Selection gap -1.8%
API

© 2026 RiskModels.app|System Status:Operational|Built for the Intelligent Retailer.

Informational use only — not investment advice. Blue Water Macro Corp.